Hi, The LWS is not of zero length. The LWS therefore should not be there unless a delay is present.
There was a doubt about this earlier and had been clarified. Akshat On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : > From: T Satyanarayana-A12694 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:31:09 +0530 >Subject: [Sip-implementors] Timestamp grammar > >According to Timestamp grammar: > >Timestamp = "Timestamp" HCOLON 1*(DIGIT) > [ "." *(DIGIT) ] [ LWS delay ] >delay = *(DIGIT) [ "." *(DIGIT) ] > >Timestamp: 1.1 LWS > >is legal since delay can have zero length. Is this intentional? > >I mean shouldn't delay be 1*(DIGIT) [ "." *(DIGIT) ] > >regards >Satya T > > >--__--__-- > >_______________________________________________ >Sip-implementors mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > > >End of Sip-implementors Digest _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
