The concept of loose routing was formally declared in bis-06.  Any principle
used before that, the most widely used of bis-02, is a strict routing
concept.  But I have not seen many difference in the routing principle from
2543 running to bis-05.
Regards,
Prasanna
Huawei Technologies

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Attila Sipos
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 1:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Loose Routing/ Strict Routing



I think there is a lot of confusion between loose routing
and strict routing.  I am a little confused too!

Please can someone confirm that these 4 statements are correct:
1. RFC3261 defines "loose routing"
2. To use "loose routing" you must use the "lr" parameter.
3. Put an another way, if you don't use the "lr" parameter,
   you're NOT using the loose routing.
4. If you don't use the "lr" parameter, you are using
   "strict routing" and the routing rules in RFC3261
   do not apply.


So this also leads me to a question regarding "strict routing".
RFC3261 states:
      Strict Routing: A proxy is said to be strict routing if it follows
         the Route processing rules of RFC 2543 and many prior work in
         progress versions of this RFC.


So my question is... which bis of RFC2543 gives the
most correct specification of "strict routing"?




Attila Sipos
Software Engineer

<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://www.vegastream.com>

__________________________________________________

VegaStream : A World of difference for your Integrated Communications

This e-mail and any attachments hereto are strictly confidential and
intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee
please notify the sender by return and delete the message. You must not
disclose, forward or copy this e-mail or attachments to any third party
without the prior consent of the sender.
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to