Yes you are correct. so should the MUST be changed to SHOULD.

 Robert Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 04:26, Prasad hj wrote:
> Hi
>
> In the rfc the Contact header is mandatory. So Contact header is
> mandatory for all 200 OK responses.
>
> Section 10.3 rfc 3261
>
> 8. The registrar returns a 200 (OK) response. The response MUST contain
> Contact header field values enumerating all current bindings.

So think about what this means if the set of all current bindings is
empty. If there are _NO_ currently registered contacts the header
field is empty.

There is no value in this case for requiring the header field name
to appear without values.

RjS

>
> Thanks
>
> At 09:37 AM 12/9/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>
>
> It's possible to have a 200 OK to Register without a Contact header
> field.
>
> A "query register", that is one with no Contacts in the request, to
> a resource with no currently registered contacts will give this result.
>
> RjS
>
> On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 22:29, sunil p wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > For a Register request, a Contact Header must be present in the
> > 200 ok response. The same is the case for Invite request also..
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 sindhur wrote :
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > > Is a contact header mandatory in a 200 "OK" response?
> > >
> > >Sindhur.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
>
>
>
>
> _____
>
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus
> -
> Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
>


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors



Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

Reply via email to