I can't point you to the paragraph, but I can tell you that you ignore them. Once a route-set has been established using the original INVITE, that route-set persists for the duration of the dialog.
Regards, Hisham > -----Original Message----- > From: ext James Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 11:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Record-Route and re-Invite > > > Hi, > In old sip bis it was specified that if a UAC receives a > re-Invite with > Record-Route it must copy it to the re-Invite response. > "If a UAS has a route set for a call leg, and receives a > refresh for that > call leg containing Record-Route headers (the only refresh > defined in this > specification is a re-INVITE), it MUST copy those headers > into any 200 class > response to that request." > > How ever in the new RFC I could not find such an instruction. > Does that mean > that it is no longer required, or have I just missed this paragraph? > > Thanks, > James. > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
