Title: RE: [Sip-implementors] RFC2833 payload type

You shouldn't rely on it.  I have also seen 99 used.

Raphael Tryster

    -----Original Message-----
    From:   Paul Long [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Sent:   Tuesday, 2 March 2004 2:29
    To:     'SIP-LIST'
    Subject:        RE: [Sip-implementors] RFC2833 payload type

    It seems like Cisco was the first to use 101 as the dynamic PT for
    RFC2833 a few years ago. Other companies probably just followed their
    lead.

    Paul

    -----Original Message-----
    From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christer
    Holmberg (JO/LMF)
    Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 5:12 AM
    To: 'Alex Zeffertt'; SIP-LIST
    Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] RFC2833 payload type


    Hi,

    RFC2833 uses dynamic payload types.

    Regards,

    Christer Holmberg
    Ericsson Finland

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alex
    > Zeffertt
    > Sent: 1. maaliskuuta 2004 13:06
    > To: SIP-LIST
    > Subject: [Sip-implementors] RFC2833 payload type
    >
    >
    > Hi all,
    >
    > Do RFC2833 telephone-events  have a reserved number in the AV
    > profile?
    > I've noticed that most implementations use 101, but this
    > doesn't appear
    > in the AV profile standard RFC1890.
    >
    > TIA,
    >
    > Alex

    _______________________________________________
    Sip-implementors mailing list
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to