Sergey, Have you ever seen this kind of Invite requests ? INVITE tel:3127190656 SIP/3.C^M t: i: 731257426:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 1 v:166.181.26.77 f: <tel:3127196154>;tag=1083783859 2 I x: sid=1010; o=Winphoria 2300 0 IN IP4 166.181.26.77:60
Also I see that a lot of Winphoria request does not end with CRLF. -Aleks > -----Original Message----- > From: Sitnikov, Sergey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 12:39 PM > To: Aleks Sheynkman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] (Please help ) question regarding sip > void and media connections > > > > Hi, > > From RFC 3261: > To be compliant with this specification, applications sending > SIP messages MUST include a SIP-Version of "SIP/2.0" > This message have "SIP/3.C" as a version, and that means it > is not SIP. > > Most likely it is some proprietary Motorola protocol. > > Sergey. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Aleks Sheynkman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 11:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] (Please help ) question regarding > sip void and media connections > Importance: High > > > Hello, > > I probably should not ask you this, but was wondering if > some could help me to figure out a small problem that I am > having with Motorola sip implementation. I am working on sip > protocol , and found interesting thing that Motorola > Winphoria server does not use SDP for transport > protocol/ports negotiation , they stick all the fields that > SDP provides directly into SIP header then all audio goes on > port 2300 and RTCP 2301. I also don't see any media and > connection negotiation. > > Have any of you ever seen this before ? I can not find this > in RFC 3261 or in any other RFC's > > Example : > INVITE tel:3127190656 SIP/3.C^M > t: > i: 731257426:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > CSeq: 1 > v:166.181.26.77 > f: <tel:3127196154>;tag=1083783859 > 2 > I > x: sid=1010; > o=Winphoria 2300 0 IN IP4 166.181.26.77:60 > > > Also do you know by any chance what this means: > SIP/3.C 200 OK > > By the standard you should have version as 2.0: > > > SIP/2.0 200 OK > Thanks a lot in advance ! > -Aleks > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
