Also. do refer RFC 3459.
http://www.armware.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc3459.html
That should give u more pointers and details towards the same.
 
Rama


Prashant Prabhu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi,
 
Which document should be referred for information on the Content-Type being "multipart/signed" ?
 
RFC 3261, as such, does not define any parameter "boundary" in Content-Type.
 
thanks,
prashant
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 11:34 AM
Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] multi body boundary in SIP

Some more info on the same...
 
Below is an example of a SIP message having multi-part bodies. Some of the points to note here are..
1> In the main msg Content Type is specified as 'multipart/signed' which i guess is used for embedded SIP msg's .. i believe 'multipart/mixed' should also do fine. This indicates there are multiple bodies in the SIP msg.
2> Content Length in the INVITE specifies the total length of both bodies (lenght of body 1 + length of body 2)
3> Content Type also has a 'boundary' field which specifies how the bodies will have a boundary mark .. in the below example the boundary being ' boundary42'
4> Also each body will have a '--' {double dash} along with the boundary field param to indicate the beginning of the body. In the belwo case the first body itself happens to be a sip message and having its own sdp body inside.
5> The end of the last body is indicated by a post '-' along with the boundary field and the 2 pre-dash.
 
 
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
      Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pc33.atlanta.com;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8
      To: Bob <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
      From: Alice <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=1928301774
      Call-ID: a84b4c76e66710
      CSeq: 314159 INVITE
      Max-Forwards: 70
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:02:03 GMT
      Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
      Content-Type: multipart/signed;
        protocol="application/pkcs7-signature";
        micalg=sha1; boundary=boundary42
      Content-Length: 568

      --boundary42
      Content-Type: message/sip

      INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
      Via: SIP/2.0/UDP pc33.atlanta.com;branch=z9hG4bKnashds8
      To: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
      From: Alice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=1928301774
      Call-ID: a84b4c76e66710
      CSeq: 314159 INVITE
      Max-Forwards: 70
      Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:02:03 GMT
      Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
      Content-Type: application/sdp
      Content-Length: 147

      v=0
      o=UserA 2890844526 2890844526 IN IP4 here.com
      s=Session SDP
      c=IN IP4 pc33.atlanta.com
      t=0 0
      m=audio 49172 RTP/AVP 0
      a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000

      --boundary42
      Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
      Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s;
         handling=required

      ghyHhHUujhJhjH77n8HHGTrfvbnj756tbB9HG4VQpfyF467GhIGfHfYT6
      4VQpfyF467GhIGfHfYT6jH77n8HHGghyHhHUujhJh756tbB9HGTrfvbnj
      n8HHGTrfvhJhjH776tbB9HG4VQbnj7567GhIGfHfYT6ghyHhHUujpfyF4
      7GhIGfHfYT64VQbnj756

      --boundary42-
 


Kaitki Agarwal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes. It always starts with two dashes. You should refer to RFC 3204 for more information on this.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Romel Khan
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] multi body boundary in SIP

Does boundary always start with two dashes?
Eg: --ANSI-ISUP-boundary


Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger


_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors


Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to