sip-implementors  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Colin Perkins
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christian Groves
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Colin Perkins
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Joe Stone \(joestone\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Colin Perkins
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [MMUSIC] RE: Problems with RFC 2327 vs RFC 4566, and between 4567 and 4568 Christian Groves
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-ID Jeroen van Bemmel
  • [Sip-implementors] rfc3455 P-Called-Party-Id stefaan . willaert
• [Sip-implementors] SIMPLE - Presence Dictionary compression Christian M Menkens
• [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC John Williams
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC Vikram Chhibber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC John Williams
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC Joegen E. Baclor
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK retrans in UAC Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Regarding Call hold Revathi Veluchamy
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Call hold Kannaiyan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Call hold Satyendra Tiwari
  • [Sip-implementors] 408 request timeout varun
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 408 request timeout Raghu . Gangi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Call hold Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Jamkhandikar, Sunil
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Gary Cote
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Jamkhandikar, Sunil
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Vikram Chhibber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SCSCF Registrar functionality Dutt Kalapatapu
• [Sip-implementors] Target refresh requests Frank Shearar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Target refresh requests John Williams
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Target refresh requests Bob Penfield
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Target refresh requests Frank Shearar
• [Sip-implementors] SIP fundamental question Anil Chaudhary
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP fundamental question Raghu . Gangi
• [Sip-implementors] Regarding ABNF and yacc Bin Chen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding ABNF and yacc Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Yong Xin
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Yong Xin
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Anders Kristensen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC 2327 SDP "c=" line question AHR
• [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Bob Penfield
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Bob Penfield
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages erol turac
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] changing IP address for sub register messages Scott Lawrence
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Vikram Chhibber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Vikram Chhibber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Joegen E. Baclor
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Paul Kyzivat
  • [Sip-implementors] Subscription Use examples Vick, Steven
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Brett Tate
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Brett Tate
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 47, Issue 32 Manpreet Singh
• Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty stevevick
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Vick, Steven
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] FW: SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] registration of multiple public user identities Sigrid Thijs
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] registration of multiple public user identities Dutt Kalapatapu
• [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec Tadkod . Vyanktesh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec Tadkod . Vyanktesh
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec cape canaveral
  • [Sip-implementors] SDP for G729 codec Tadkod . Vyanktesh
• [Sip-implementors] Grouped DTMF's RFC 2833 Mandeep Ahuja
• Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds aresame Sarkar, Uttam
• [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds are same Thirumal Margabandhu
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds aresame Michael Procter
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds are same Gary Cote
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds are same Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP registrar info - why from and to fileds are same Dutt Kalapatapu
• [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Chulhoon Hwang
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Unsolicited NOTIFY Scott Lawrence
• [Sip-implementors] I-D on implementing GRUU Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] I-D on practical requirements for the dialog event package Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Vick, Steven
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Vick, Steven
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP and ptime in RFC4566 is faulty Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] SIP Options message retransmission varun
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Options message retransmission raghuram gangi
• [Sip-implementors] Distinguishing SUBSCRIBE refresh and full-state query??? Vikram Chhibber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Distinguishing SUBSCRIBE refresh and full-statequery??? Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
• [Sip-implementors] SDP filling up o= field using NTP. PLS HELP AHR
• [Sip-implementors] free sip server supporting presence for windows ce messenger rakesh kushwaha
• [Sip-implementors] Reg Poc Presence Testing karthik
• [Sip-implementors] Record Route and top Via Bin Chen
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Record Route and top Via Joegen E. Baclor
• [Sip-implementors] SIPS in TO-FROM header but UDP Deepak . Mawandia
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIPS in TO-FROM header but UDP Gary Cote
• [Sip-implementors] ACK in statefull proxy. Ivar Lumi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK in statefull proxy. Joegen E. Baclor
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Is Max-Forward mandatory also in ACK and CANCELrequests Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Is Max-Forward mandatory also in ACK and CANCELrequests Attila Sipos
• [Sip-implementors] Is Max-Forward mandatory also in ACK and CANCEL requests Marco Ambu
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Is Max-Forward mandatory also in ACK and CANCEL requests Scott Lawrence
• [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server raghuram gangi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server raghuram gangi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Scott Lawrence
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Modification of RESPONSE code by Proxy Server Attila Sipos
• [Sip-implementors] Persistent TLS and NAT Nenad Milidrag
• [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Ira Kadin
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sweeney, Andrew \(Andrew\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Ira Kadin
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Rajnish Jain
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x AHR
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Meir Leshem
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x erol turac
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Jerry Yin
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sweeney, Andrew \(Andrew\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Victor Paulsamy
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Jerry Yin
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Jerry Yin
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Nebojsa Miljanovic
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP in 2xx response after reliable 18x Sarkar, Uttam
• [Sip-implementors] Implementation of H.264 in SIP Express Router! Steven Wong
• [Sip-implementors] Regarding Branch ID Gayathri Madda
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Branch ID Prithvi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Branch ID Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Einat Soudry
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Einat Soudry
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Einat Soudry
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Selection of transport protocol Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] URI syntax in Refer-To header Dmitry Akindinov
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] URI syntax in Refer-To header Jeroen van Bemmel
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] URI syntax in Refer-To header Dmitry Akindinov
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] URI syntax in Refer-To header Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] URI syntax in Refer-To header Dmitry Akindinov
• [Sip-implementors] after 183 or 180 have a CANCEL patroclo Perez
• [Sip-implementors] SIP-URI Hadar Lotan
  • [Sip-implementors] SIP-URI Adi Babai
• [Sip-implementors] After message 180 or 183 I have a CANCEL? patroclo Perez
• [Sip-implementors] dialog statefull proxy Ivar Lumi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] dialog statefull proxy Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] dialog statefull proxy Ivar Lumi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] dialog statefull proxy Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] dialog statefull proxy Ivar Lumi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] dialog statefull proxy Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] dialog statefull proxy Ivar Lumi
• [Sip-implementors] Registration for SIPit 20 is open Robert Sparks
  • [Sip-implementors] Registration for SIPit 20 is open Robert Sparks
  • [Sip-implementors] Reminder: Registration for SIPit 20 is open Robert Sparks

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]