> While composing request uri for INVITE, > where there is no user portion but there > is a user-info parameter such as cic, > how is request uri encoded ?
I am not aware of a draft or RFC which allows it. > Do we need to include a ; before the > user-info parameter ? From the start > lines below, which one is correct ? > > INVITE sip:;[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 > > OR > > INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 > I think that both are syntactically correct. I am not aware of any draft or rfc that would indicate the explicit intention that you are desiring. However if pstngateway receives the message and knows how user-info gets allocated, both can be legal. If you are trying to apply an RFC 2806 extension or bis, I don't think that either conform. The following is an RFC 2806 extension defining cic. http://www.softarmor.com/iptel/drafts/draft-yu-tel-url-07.txt _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
