sip-implementors  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question related to 3PCC Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question related to 3PCC Sarkar, Uttam
• [Sip-implementors] Question about offer/answer model Sonalkar, Rohit
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about offer/answer model Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about offer/answer model Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• [Sip-implementors] Ringing Satyendra Tiwari
• [Sip-implementors] SIP and NAT Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP and NAT Kannaiyan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP and NAT Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP and NAT Kannaiyan
• [Sip-implementors] MIME type for Q931 tunneling over SIP T.Danayya Naidu
• [Sip-implementors] ACK is not forwarded by proxy Revathi Veluchamy
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK is not forwarded by proxy Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK is not forwarded by proxy Kannaiyan
• [Sip-implementors] STUN Ivar
• [Sip-implementors] Question regarding BNF and Contact:-Header Michael Hirschbichler
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding BNF and Contact:-Header Attila Sipos
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding BNF and Contact:-Header Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding BNF and Contact:-Header Bala Neelakantan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding BNF and Contact:-Header Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding BNF and Contact:-Header Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding BNF and Contact:-Header Bala Neelakantan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding BNF and Contact:-Header Michael Hirschbichler
• [Sip-implementors] Reliable STUN request scheme and rport meino . cramer
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Reliable STUN request scheme and rport meino . cramer
• [Sip-implementors] hi,this is saroj from india saroj nayak
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] hi,this is saroj from india Yossi Ben Hagai
• [Sip-implementors] port restricted NAT Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] port restricted NAT Gaurav Kheterpal
• [Sip-implementors] early media response codec sequence is different from final answer codec sequence Barman, Sibon B \(Sibon\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] early media response codec sequence is different from final answer codec sequence Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] early media response codec sequence is differentfrom final answer codec sequence KASTURI Narayanan \(kasnaray\)
• [Sip-implementors] Regarding REQUEST-DEPOSITION header venkatesh chandran
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding REQUEST-DEPOSITION header Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Media Problem bec of NAT shankar
• Re: [Sip-implementors] 415 Unsupported media Attila Sipos
  • [Sip-implementors] IMS roaming query ? raghavendra poojari
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] IMS roaming query ? Gary Cote
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] IMS roaming query ? Raghu . Gangi
• [Sip-implementors] computing md5 hashes Mushtaq Ilyas
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] computing md5 hashes Yossi Ben Hagai
• Re: [Sip-implementors] UPDATE and reINVITE B, Nataraju
• [Sip-implementors] non 2xx final response to BYE Sonja Belic
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] non 2xx final response to BYE Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] non 2xx final response to BYE B, Nataraju
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] non 2xx final response to BYE Mushtaq Ilyas
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] non 2xx final response to BYE puneet jain
• [Sip-implementors] Question about UPDATE request Nina Garaca
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about UPDATE request Chandra Sekhar Murthy M.V.V.
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about UPDATE request ramakrishna.adukuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about UPDATE request Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about UPDATE request B, Nataraju
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about UPDATE request Chandra Sekhar Murthy M.V.V.
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about UPDATE request Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about UPDATE request Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about UPDATE request Nina Garaca
• [Sip-implementors] nonce size (authentication) Mushtaq Ilyas
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] nonce size (authentication) Gaurav Kheterpal
• [Sip-implementors] SDP offer/answer for delay media Bu, Wenfei \(Leo\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP offer/answer for delay media Paul Kyzivat
  • [Sip-implementors] VS: SDP offer/answer for delay media Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] VS: SDP offer/answer for delay media Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] VS: SDP offer/answer for delay media Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] VS: SDP offer/answer for delay media Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 49, Issue 21 Francois.plagnard
• [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication Mushtaq Ilyas
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication Jeremy King
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication ramakrishna.adukuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication Bob Penfield
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication Gaurav Kheterpal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication Dale . Worley
  • [Sip-implementors] 415 Unsupported media Sambit Pooja
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 415 Unsupported media Sarkar, Uttam
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] 415 Unsupported media Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Basic Authentication Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] ACK for 4xx Reponse P Raj
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK for 4xx Reponse P Raj
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] ACK for 4xx Reponse ramakrishna.adukuri
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 49, Issue 20 Francois.plagnard
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 49, Issue 19 Francois.plagnard
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 49, Issue 18 Francois.plagnard
• [Sip-implementors] Cancel and server transaction Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancel and server transaction Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancel and server transaction Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancel and server transaction ramakrishna.adukuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancel and server transaction Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancel and server transaction Chandra Sekhar Murthy M.V.V.
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancel and server transaction Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancel and server transaction Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Cancel and server transaction Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Authentication and Authorization Mushtaq Ilyas
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Authentication and Authorization Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Authentication and Authorization Muazzam Arslan Bhatti
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Authentication and Authorization Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Authentication and Authorization Mushtaq Ilyas
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Authentication and Authorization Dale . Worley
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 49, Issue 17 Francois.plagnard
• [Sip-implementors] From header field. Yunus OLGUN
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] From header field. Chandra Sekhar Murthy M.V.V.
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] From header field. Chandra Sekhar Murthy M.V.V.
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] From header field. Gaurav Kheterpal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] From header field. Mahipati Deshpande
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] From header field. B, Nataraju
• [Sip-implementors] Question regarding SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY Zarko Coklin
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question regarding SUBSCRIBE-NOTIFY Dale . Worley
• [Sip-implementors] Regarding Record Route Guru V
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding Record Route Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 49, Issue 16 Francois.plagnard
• Re: [Sip-implementors] Sip-implementors Digest, Vol 49, Issue 15 Francois.plagnard
• [Sip-implementors] [HELP] How ISDN subscriber Register to SIP Server Ding, Zheng \(Derrick\)
• [Sip-implementors] SIP Phone Switch Off & Deregister Shrikant Khadilkar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Phone Switch Off & Deregister Murali Krishnan
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Phone Switch Off & Deregister Gaurav Kheterpal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Phone Switch Off & Deregister Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] SIP Phone Switch Off & Deregister Harpreet Juneja
  • [Sip-implementors] SIP Phone Switch Off & Deregister Harpreet S Juneja
• [Sip-implementors] Bonjour/DNS-SD usage Henning Schulzrinne
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Bonjour/DNS-SD usage Gaurav Kheterpal
• [Sip-implementors] forking and 3xx responses Chaney, Charles \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] forking and 3xx responses Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] forking and 3xx responses Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] forking and 3xx responses Chaney, Charles \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] forking and 3xx responses Paul Kyzivat
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] forking and 3xx responses Chaney, Charles \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] forking and 3xx responses Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] RTP ports achalk
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP ports Raghu . Gangi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP ports achalk
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] RTP ports Andrew Chalk
• [Sip-implementors] De-Registering by User Agent Santosh Karankoti
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] De-Registering by User Agent Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] De-Registering by User Agent Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• [Sip-implementors] Media Problem bec of NAT srinivas Antarvedi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Media Problem bec of NAT Raghu . Gangi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Media Problem bec of NAT Ravi Rupela
  • [Sip-implementors] Media Problem bec of NAT Yossi Ben Hagai
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Media Problem bec of NAT shankar
• [Sip-implementors] Could the UAS change the SDP offer in 200 OK? Bu, Wenfei \(Leo\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Could the UAS change the SDP offer in 200 OK? Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Could the UAS change the SDP offer in 200 OK? Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] Question about BYE/481 Daniel Corbe
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about BYE/481 Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about BYE/481 Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
• [Sip-implementors] Test suite for security threats Baniel Uri-CUB001
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sip] Test suite for security threats Sanjay Sinha \(sanjsinh\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] [Sip] Test suite for security threats Gary Cote
• [Sip-implementors] Query related to BYE and CANCEL venkatesh chandran
• [Sip-implementors] Question about Caller ID River
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about Caller ID Gaurav Kheterpal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about Caller ID River
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Question about Caller ID Kumar, Hemanth
• [Sip-implementors] Regarding freeware tool to test IMS components venkatesh chandran
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding freeware tool to test IMS components Darshan Bildikar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Regarding freeware tool to test IMS components Gaurav Kheterpal
• [Sip-implementors] Proxy timer C and 408 (Request Timeout) Ivar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Proxy timer C and 408 (Request Timeout) Manjunath Warad
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Proxy timer C and 408 (Request Timeout) Ivar
• [Sip-implementors] Query: Regarding Re-Inivite Txn timeout when Intermediate record route Proxy is down NC Reddy
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Regarding Re-Inivite Txn timeout when Intermediate record route Proxy is down Vikram Chhibber
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Regarding Re-Inivite Txn timeout whenIntermediate record route Proxy is down ramakrishna.adukuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Regarding Re-Inivite Txn timeout whenIntermediate record route Proxy is down Raghu . Gangi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Query: Regarding Re-Inivite Txn timeout when Intermediate record route Proxy is down Vikram Chhibber
• [Sip-implementors] multivalued headers Nap
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] multivalued headers David Benoit
• [Sip-implementors] BICC-SIPT interworking Bu, Wenfei \(Leo\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] BICC-SIPT interworking Ade Adewunmi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] BICC-SIPT interworking Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
• [Sip-implementors] why is from and to contact fields are same? Thirumal Margabandhu
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] why is from and to contact fields are same? Siddhardha Garige
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] why is from and to contact fields are same? Thirumal Margabandhu
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] why is from and to contact fields are same? Dale . Worley
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] why is from and to contact fields are same? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
• [Sip-implementors] size of SIP messages amit rehalia
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] size of SIP messages Sarkar, Uttam
• [Sip-implementors] Entity tag in response to a stop-publish request Pankaj Munjal
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Entity tag in response to a stop-publish request Rajaram Tripathy
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] Entity tag in response to a stop-publish request Pankaj Munjal
• Re: [Sip-implementors] How to alter the CONTACT header in 200 OK response? John Williams
• [Sip-implementors] diff b/w Accept-Contact and Route header? Janakiraman N
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] diff b/w Accept-Contact and Route header? Paul Kyzivat
• [Sip-implementors] CANCEL with/without 1xx To tag Del Stevens
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL with/without 1xx To tag Simith Nambiar
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL with/without 1xx To tag Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL with/without 1xx To tag ramakrishna.adukuri
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL with/without 1xx To tag Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL with/without 1xx To tag Singh, Indresh \(SNL US\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL with/without 1xx To tag Jamkhandikar, Sunil
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] CANCEL with/without 1xx To tag Sarkar, Uttam
• Re: [Sip-implementors] CSeq in subsequent request in dialog Attila Sipos
• [Sip-implementors] NAT Issue srinivas Antarvedi
• [Sip-implementors] rfc 3680: When are the id attributed needed? Herr Janzon
• [Sip-implementors] Looking for "Hard Phones" with Presence/IM Capabilities... Alexander, Louis
• [Sip-implementors] How to alter the CONTACT header in 200 OK response? Janakiraman N
• [Sip-implementors] standart sip server budi
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] standart sip server Christer Holmberg \(JO/LMF\)
  • Re: [Sip-implementors] standart sip server Ivar
• [Sip-implementors] Potential race condition between UPDATE and 200 OK to INVITE and UPDATE related questions ++ Nina Garaca

[Earlier messages] [Later messages]