Hi All,
I have a question regarding supporting the session timer (draft from July 18,
2004).
>From one side it's written that
"A UAC that supports the session timer extension defined here MUST
include a Supported header field in each request (except ACK)"
>From other side on page 18 there is a table, indicating the UAS behavior
UAC supports? refresher parameter refresher parameter
in request in response
-------------------------------------------------------
N none uas
N uac NA
N uas NA
Y none uas or uac
Y uac uac
Y uas uas
>From line N1 we can see that if "timer" supported header doesn't exist in
>INVITE, the UAS
may include it in 200 response.
And visa versa.
It is
possible that the UAC requested session timer (and thus included a
Session-Expires header field in the request), but there was no
Require or Session-Expires header field in the 2xx response. This
will happen when the UAS doesn't support the session timer extension,
and only the UAC has asked for a session timer (no proxies have
requested it). In this case, if the UAC still wishes to use the
session timer (they are purely for its benefit alone), it has to
perform them.
Does it mean, that UAS or UAC has to send UPDATE/RE-INVITE to the non-supported
timer side
and "cut" the session if 200 reply is not received (why should it be received
if other side doesn't support it) ?
I hope I explained the problem
Thanks in advance
Ira
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
