Wainwright, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 05.05.05 20:47:21: > If I use "a=sendonly" in the INVITE message when putting a call on hold what > response should I expect back if the endpoint does not support this > attribute ? > > Do I still get the 200OK and determine the attribute is not supported by the > absence of the "a=recvonly" attribute implying I need to fall back to using > "C=0.0.0.0"
Section 14.2 of RFC 3261 says, in regard to receiving a re-INVITE within an established dialog, "If the new session description is not acceptable, the UAS can reject it by returning a 488 (Not Acceptable Here) response for the re-INVITE. This response SHOULD include a Warning header field." Dale _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
