Thanks Jeroen, I see what you mean, the parameters are invalid. It's a shame that "20.39 To" does not refer to this table.
Matt -----Original Message----- From: Jeroen van Bemmel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 November 2005 10:33 To: Matthew Gardiner; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Are some SIP URL parameters invalid for the URIwith a To: header ? Matthew, See table 1 in RFC3261 (section 19.1.2) Jeroen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Gardiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 10:39 AM Subject: [Sip-implementors] Are some SIP URL parameters invalid for the URIwith a To: header ? > Hi all, > > I have inherited the maintenance of a SIP stack, and after a certain > degree > of "bug-hunting", I discovered that the stack was removing any occurances > of the following URI-parameters from the URI within the To header: > > transport, ttl, maddr > > I have searched through my main sources of core SIP reference (3261 and > Alan > Johnston's book) and can find no reference to certain URI parameters being > invalid in a To: header. Perhaps the previous maintainer removed these as > the To: header is not relevant to routing, however it does seem a bit over > vigilant to me? > > Could anyone comment as to whether such URI-parameters are actually > invalid > in such a header and whether or not the stack is right to remove them? > > thanks for your time, > > Matthew Gardiner > Software Enginneer > Aculab > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
