Comments inline... Thanks & Regards, Nataraju A.B.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Manpreet Singh Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 9:20 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Sip] [Sip-implementors] Session Timers RFC 4028 typo? Importance: High In Paragraph 9 for " UAS Behavior" there is a line stating: If the incoming request contains a Supported header field with a value 'timer' but does not contain a Session-Expires header, it means that the UAS is indicating support for timers but is not requesting one. The UAS may request a session timer in the 2XX response by including a Session-Expires header field. The value MUST NOT be set to a duration lower than the value in the Min-SE header field in the request, if it is present. Its the incoming request to the UAS and this is discussing about the UAS behaviour to handle that request then shouldnt that be a UAC in the above paragraph instead of a UAS? So if the incoming request has supported header with timer with no session-expires header, the "UAC" is saying it supports timers but not requesting one. [ABN] looks like a typo error in RFC....you are right UAC is indicating it supports session timer but not requesting for this session.... Please correct me if I am missing something. Manpreet _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
