Sorry, I was misunderstood the question. My earlier answer would be
valid if the 422 response was received for the initial dialog creating
request itself...

Thanks & Regards,
Nataraju A.B.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nataraju
A B
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] RFC4028 and 422 response to INVITE

Comments inline....

Thanks & Regards,
Nataraju A.B.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 3:45 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] RFC4028 and 422 response to INVITE

Hello,

Chapter 7.3 says:

7.3.  Processing a 422 Response

   If the response to a session refresh request is a 422 (Session
   Interval Too Small) response message, then the UAC MAY retry the
   request.  The procedures for retrying are described in Section 7.4.
   This new request constitutes a new transaction and SHOULD have the
   same value as the Call-ID, To, and From of the previous request, but
   the CSeq should contain a new sequence number that is one higher than
   the previous.


I was wondering why the new request should contain the same Call-ID, To
and
>From i.e. what will actually happen if the new request will contain
newly
generated Call-ID, To and From?

[ABN] one simple reason would be to handle similar to how it would have
been handled in case of 401/407 challenge for INV, REG or any other
requests. 

This lead to issue why we have this constraint for retry on failure ? 

        In my personal opinion it's been done because the second request
was sent        due to failure of first request, hence the same call-id,
from and TO headers     have been retained. 

[/ABN]

thanks,
Paulius

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to