You cannot Send SDP(answer) in a response that is not reliable, for the simple 
reason you don't get the Acknowledgement whether the offerer has received it or 
not. The offer/answer model in SIP mandates that the answer be received 
reliably.
This is taken care by using reliable provisional response or by sending ACK to 
2XX response.


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andreas Byström
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 6:02 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Sip-implementors] Offer/answer retransmission OK?

Hi I have two SDP questions:

1. Is it (according to RFCs) ok to send the SDP answer in a SIP response that 
is not reliable? I.e, is it ok to send SDP in 180 (that is not using
PRACK)
2. If sent in 180 (as above) is it then ok to send the exact same response 
again in 200 OK? Is it allowed to respond to a offer in two different mesages 
(first 180 and then 200). Does it matter if 180 is reliable (say that PRACK is 
used for 180, still ok to send SDP answer in 200?)

Regards,
// Andreas
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors


The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments.

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
email.

www.wipro.com

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to