Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > Adam Roach wrote: > >> In practice, the received parameter is interpreted *almost* exclusively >> by the entity that wrote it -- so interoperability shouldn't be as >> substantially harmed by differing interpretations than might it first >> appear. > > > That depends. A proxy that inserts a received parameter and *then* > forwards the request to the next downstream server may cause some > concern to the receiving server. The specific behavior we have > observed is that the next downstream server is unable to parse the > request because of the brackets in the topmost Via "received" > parameter that were added by the previous upstream entity.
Why are they parsing anything but the topmost Via header field? It seems a waste of processing time to parse the entire stack of Vias. /a _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
