"ext Vijay K. Gurbani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Hm, meaning that everyone should accept both IPv6address and >> IPv6reference in the via-received?
>Yes, although this means that the ABNF is implicitly your >(2) from the list above; i.e., >2) via-received = "received" EQUAL (IPv4address / IPv6address / > IPv6reference) >However, agreeing to leave the representation of the "received" >parameter as-is is skirting around this issue. I would rather >we normatively chose (1), and colloquially specified that (2) is >allowed from a leniency viewpoint. I could live with this, if (2) is explicitly mentioned and allowed for 3261-compatibility, like via-received = "received" EQUAL (IPv4address / IPv6reference) via-received-ip6-3261-compatible = "received" EQUAL IPv6address --Pekka _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
