I question this. In fact, I question the whole notion of two numbers.
In the below proposal, how would the following be presented to the callee?
INVITE ...
To: ...
From: "George W. Bush, POTUS" <tel:202-456-1111>
P-Asserted-Identity: "Dave Letterman" <tel:212-555-1234>
Privacy:none
When offered a trusted identity and an untrusted identity, do you really
want the UAS to display the untrusted one?
If the above had "Privacy:id", so that the P-Asserted-Identity was
removed before the request was passed to the UAS, then it might make
sense to display the value from the From header. But in that case I
would want some indication of whether or not the displayed value is to
be trusted.
Paul
Franz Edler wrote:
>> Yes, I'd looked through those RFCs... I guess the caller ID in the From
>> header should be used to convey CLI displayed to the user and PAI should
>> be used for the ANI?
>
> Yes. This makes sense.
> I am not familiar with the role of the ANI, but if it corresponds to the
> carrier trusted identity information than it should be mapped to PAI.
>
> Franz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
Sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
