As Divya correctly said, the CSeq of the ACK matches that in the INVITE.

And so would a CANCEL.

CANCEL and ACK have the same CSeq as the INVITE.

Regards,

Attila



>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Divya
>> Sachdeva
>> Sent: 16 November 2006 07:14
>> To: Sachin Rastogi
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Re-Invite Cseq
>> 
>> 
>> Soory but i dont agrree with this as per RFC 3261 in section 13.2,24
>> 
>> "The header fields of the ACK are constructed
>> in the same way as for any request sent within a dialog (see Section
>> 12) with the exception of the CSeq and the header fields related to
>> authentication. The sequence number of the CSeq header field MUST be
>> the same as the INVITE being acknowledged, but the CSeq method MUST
>> be ACK. The ACK MUST contain the same credentials as the INVITE."
>> 
>> 
>> So the Cseq of ACK will be 1
>> 
>> Rgds
>> Divya
>> 
>> On 11/16/06, Sachin Rastogi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Divya,
>> >    Re-Invite with Cseq 3 is correct.
>> >    INVITE-200OK with cseq as 1
>> >    ACK for INVITE-200OK with Cseq as 2
>> >    Re-INVITE with cseq as 3 is a correct.
>> >
>> >    As per Rfc 3261 "Therefore, if
>> >    the local sequence number is not empty, the value of the local
>> >    sequence number MUST be *incremented by one*, and this 
>> value MUST be
>> >    placed into the CSeq header field. "
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Sachin
>> >
>> >
>> > On 11/16/06, Divya Sachdeva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > If a session is already established between 2 UAs
>> > > and the Cseq for the Invite was 1 then
>> > > If i now send a reInvite from UA1 to UA2 what will be 
>> the Cseq for this
>> > > Invite ..will it be incremented by 1 or again any 
>> arbitary number will
>> > > be
>> > > chosen
>> > > As  in my case wheni was implementing ,it  got 
>> incremented from 1 to 3
>> > > .Can
>> > > anybody explain me this behaviour
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Sip-implementors mailing list
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sip-implementors mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>> 

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to