In general, I don't think it provides any benefit and reduces interoperability. Keep in mind that a proxy can reject numerous times (407, 500, etcetera).
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jeroen van Bemmel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:45 PM > To: Brett Tate; kishore sowdi; Divya Sachdeva; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Re-Invite Cseq > > > The receiver typically should not try enforcing the "increase by > > exactly 1" rule. I mention this because prior hops might have > > rejected a prior request. Thus the cseq gap might subsequently be > > larger than 1 when it reaches subsequent destinations. > > Is there any value in trying to enforce "increase by not too > much" (say 70, i.e. allowing for 70 hops each challenging the > request)? > > Jeroen > > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
