Hi, In my opinion, UAS should send one of following ...400, 416. thanks, Vipul Rastogi Engineer, Business Management Team Telecommunication Network Business Samsung Electronics CO, LTD Suwon P.O.BOX 105, 416 Korea 442-600 MO 010-9530-0354 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Bystr?m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 3:41 AM Subject: [Sip-implementors] Error in incoming req uri, what to do?
What should a UA do in case it receives an request with an malformed sipuri in the request line? For example if there is an incoming INVITE [EMAIL PROTECTED] sip/2.0 (ie the sender has not escaped the # character). I guess there would be good to respond with maybe 400 Bad Request or some other 4XX response, but I cant find something that supports this in the RFCs. Does anyone know if there is some specifications that defines what to do in a case with malformed uri in the requestline or is it up do the developer of the UAS to decide? If no answer at all the UAC will probably retransmit. Regards, // Andreas _______________________________ Andreas Bystr?m Software Engineer Teligent AB Konsul Jonssons v?g 17 P.O. Box 213 SE 14923 Nyn?shamn mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: <http://www.teligent.se/> www.teligent.se phone: +46 (0)8 4101 7221 mobile: +46 (0)733 1172 21 fax: +46 (0)8 520 193 36 _______________________________ _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
