[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andreas_Bystr=F6m?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I'm kind of in the middle of the stack provider and the UA provider here...
> But I guess I should interpret your responses that in case of a sip uri
> with
> the # error, there is no specification that says that the UAS (B2BUA in
> this
> case) MUST send a sip response?
>
> Clearly, the UA should send a response, either success or failure,
> depending on the strategy you choose. Otherwise the upstream agent
> will keep sending you the request, and then eventually time-out, which
> from the point of view of the overall SIP system is the worst failure
> mode.
Oh, duh! Yes. I hope Andreas wasn't considering the option of sending
*no* response. IMO there is no obligation for the UAS to send an *error*
response in this case. It *may* respond with a 2xx, ignoring the error.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
