On Monday 04 February 2008 13:56:15 Jesus Rodriguez wrote: > The UAC does not accept the 200OK because the To-tag it > received in the 180 from the first UAS is different of the To-Tag > received in the 200OK from the second UAS
Dividing it in parts I think that UAC's behaviour is wrong: - A UAC can receive multiples provisional responses 1XX (even if they are 180/183) from different UAS. - If those provisional replies include early media then a session is started, but not a dialog (just early dialog). - If later a 200 OK from any other UAS is received the UAC should discard other replies and accept it as a confirmed dialog. - There is no need of receiving a provisional response before a 200 OK, so the 200 OK above is valid. So IMHO the UAC should accept that 200 OK. Best regards ;) -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
