Hola Iñaki,
> On Monday 04 February 2008 13:56:15 Jesus Rodriguez wrote: >> The UAC does not accept the 200OK because the To-tag it >> received in the 180 from the first UAS is different of the To-Tag >> received in the 200OK from the second UAS > > Dividing it in parts I think that UAC's behaviour is wrong: > > - A UAC can receive multiples provisional responses 1XX (even if > they are > 180/183) from different UAS. > > - If those provisional replies include early media then a session is > started, > but not a dialog (just early dialog). > > - If later a 200 OK from any other UAS is received the UAC should > discard > other replies and accept it as a confirmed dialog. > > - There is no need of receiving a provisional response before a 200 > OK, so the > 200 OK above is valid. > > So IMHO the UAC should accept that 200 OK. Thanks for your answer. I hope that both Kasturi and your reply help me to convince the UAC vendor about its wrong behavior :) Regards. Saludos JesusR. ------------------------------------ Jesus Rodriguez VozTelecom Sistemas, S.L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.voztele.com Tel. 902360305 ------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
