Hi, Yes good solution. In this case SDP of 200 OK to the INVITE should be treated as Offer3 not Answer.
Regards, Karthic -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of geeta soragavi Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 10:22 AM To: santoshkumar pati; [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] SDP (answer_1) Hi, To my understanding , In the scenario mentioned by you. INVITE (Offer1) 18x (Answer1) UPDATE (Offer2) 2xx UPDATE (Answer2) 2xx INVITE (Offer3) /* This will be a new offer again */ ACK INVITE (Answer3) So an answer for offer3 needs to be sent in ACK. Regards, Geetha --- santoshkumar pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *Hi All,* > * Can U corect me, If i am wrong....* > ** > *Assume the UAC receives the SDP (answer_1) in a reliable 18x. After > that, is sends eg an UPDATE with a new offer, and receives a new > (answer_2) in the > UPDATE response. Then, INVITE 200 OK is received, from the same UAS. > Now, to my understanding the SDP in the INVITE 200 OK response shall > still be the one first sent, ie answer_1, but since that is now not > "valid" > anymore (since answer_2 has been received after > that) the UAC > shall not use > the SDP received in the 200. Instead it shall use the > latest answer, ie answer_2. > > * > *Regards* > *Santosh* <[email protected]> > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > Bring your gang together - do your thing. Go to http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
