Assume if PRACK is sent in this scnario , the
offer/answer will be different, as SDP body in the
PRACK is optional , and if a SDP body is sent in the
PRACK then the immediate response of that PRACK must
contain an answer.

For Eg:

INVITE (Offer1)
18x    (Answer1)
PRACK  (Offer)
2xx PRACK (Answer)
UPDATE (Offer2)
2xx UPDATE (Answer2)
2xx INVITE (Offer3) /* This will be a new offer again
*/
ACK INVITE (Answer3)

Thanks and Regards,
Geetha
--- Brett Tate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >   To my understanding ,
> >         In the scenario mentioned by you.
> >    INVITE (Offer1)
> >    18x    (Answer1)
> >    UPDATE (Offer2)
> >    2xx UPDATE (Answer2)
> >    2xx INVITE (Offer3) /* This will be a new offer
> again */
> >    ACK INVITE (Answer3)
> > 
> > So an answer for offer3 needs to be sent in ACK.
> 
> Within your example (assuming PRACK used but not
> shown), the SDP within
> INVITE 2xx must be ignored.  Thus it is not an
> offer; and there would
> not be an answer within the ACK.
> 
> 
> > > *Hi All,*
> > > * Can U corect me, If i am wrong....*
> > > **
> > > *Assume the UAC receives the SDP (answer_1) in a
> 
> > > reliable 18x. After that, is sends eg an UPDATE
> with 
> > > a new offer, and receives a new(answer_2) in the
> > > UPDATE response. Then, INVITE 200 OK is
> received, 
> > > from the same UAS.
> > > Now, to my understanding the SDP in the 
> > > INVITE 200 OK response shall still  be the one 
> > > first sent, ie answer_1, but since that is now
> not 
> > > "valid" anymore (since answer_2 has been
> received after
> > > that) the UAC shall not use > the SDP received
> in 
> > > the 200. Instead it shall use the 
> > > latest answer, ie  answer_2.
> 
> The SDP within INVITE 2xx must be ignored.  Vendors
> which place the
> useless SDP within the INVITE 2xx generally do so
> for perceived
> interoperability reasons with devices not yet
> compliant to rfc3261.
> Based upon rfc analysis after SIPit 21, the SIP
> working group appears to
> have agreed that the useless SDP is not required to
> be SDP from the
> reliable 18x; thus it may be the SDP resulting from
> UPDATE.
> 
> Many answers concerning offer/answer can be found
> within
> draft-ietf-sipping-sip-offeranswer.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
>
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
> 



      DELETE button is history. Unlimited mail storage is just a click away. Go 
to https://edit.india.yahoo.com/config/eval_register
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to