El Wednesday 05 March 2008 10:42:28 Andreas Byström escribió: > Does "user not registered" really fit into the description of 404 in > RFC3261? A subscriber that isnt registered does still exists in the domain > that is handled by the server, doesnt it? I would say that the description > of 480 is better for the unregistered case. RFC3261: > ----------------------------- > 480 Temporarily Unavailable > > "The callee's end system was contacted successfully but the callee is > currently unavailable (for example, is not logged in, logged in but > in a state that precludes communication with the callee, or has > activated the "do not disturb" feature)" > ... > "This status is also returned by a redirect or proxy server that > recognizes the user identified by the Request-URI, but does not > currently have a valid forwarding location for that user." > ------------------------------- > > In my mind, an unregistered user does exist but the is no information in > the callee's system on how to reach the subscriber. Compare with PSTN or > mobile networks. If you unplugg your phone or turn of your mobile, the > caller will get the prompt "User is not reachable" and not "there is no > such number"
Yes, I have it clear now, thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
