On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Sree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In such a scenario, what is the action to be taken on Response that contain > the Via branch and Cseq method identical to the Request that created the > transaction, but differs in either/all of the following headers:
> From: [differs in from-URI only] A proper RFC 3261 compliant implementation (that matches dialogs based on from-tag, to-tag, and Call-ID fields only) should treat this as a valid response. > From: [differs in from-tag] This response will fail dialog matching and will thus be ignored. > To: [differs in to-URI only] This is a valid response. > To: [differs in to-tag] This means that the request was forked and the response has been sent by a different UAS. > Call-ID: This response will fail dialog matching and will thus be ignored. -- Raj Jain _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
