Not necessary. A proxy can spiral SIP message to itself (may be different application [SIP servlets]).
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin Jacob Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 8:28 PM To: padmaja venkata; Scott Lawrence Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Proxy forwarding invite with multiple viaheaders I think Padmaja's hinting that the proxy has inserted those 3 Vias the first time itself, before it could spiral it 'out' and receiving it back. If the proxy had spiralled it out, there would be other proxies's Vias as well. Care to clear this Padmaja? --- On Fri, 6/13/08, Scott Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Scott Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Proxy forwarding invite with multiple > via headers > To: "padmaja venkata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Friday, June 13, 2008, 11:18 AM > On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 16:38 +0530, padmaja venkata wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the reply. I, however, use only one proxy > and that single proxy > > has inserted 3 via headers of its own. Please see the > Invite from the UA and > > the corresponding Invite forwarded by the proxy below. > My question again is- > > Is it OK to have more than one Via headers inserted by > a single proxy? Is it > > defined in RFC? > > Yes, it's ok. The proxy in question 'spiraled' > the request (sent the > request through itself) in the course of processing it. > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
