El Tuesday 17 June 2008 13:28:42 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió: > El Tuesday 17 June 2008 13:12:09 Suganya D escribió: > > Hi, > > > > Yes, a CANCEL is valid only for an INVITE method. > > > > Hence when a CANCEL arrives with a CSeq number that does not match > > INVITE can it not be considered that a mis-behaving entity is > > attempting to CANCEL a non-INVITE transaction? > > No UAC will send a CANCEL for a non-INVITE transaction. Of course it could > occur, and also a UAC could send a request with method CHICKEN XDDD > > But if I receive a not-matching CANCEL I will consider that the INVITE > associated to that CANCEL hasn't arrived yet. So the reply would be 484.
Sorry, I mean 481. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
