Right, I agree with you. Actually, it is asking who will take the responsibility that the two invites have duplicated Call_ID + From Tag.
Alex Zhang ESN: 6-554-8782 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of I?aki Baz Castillo Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 5:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Re-invite without To Tag El Tuesday 08 July 2008 09:45:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > Hi All, > > The re-invite should be processed, by UAS, as the request within the > dialog. In this point, the re-invite without the To tag should be > discarded, right? Can you please explain what a "re-INVITE without the To tag is"? It makes no sense, a dialog mathing request MUST contain the SAME From tag, To tag and Call-ID of previous transactions in same dialog. If a new request hasn't To tag then it's not an in-dialog request (so it's not a re-INVITE). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
