Well, I can find nothing that formally says 1xx excludes 100, and in
fact do find the contrary. However there are places in 3261 that give
rules for 1xx that in fact don't apply to 100. So be careful when 1xx is
used.
Paul
Attila Sipos wrote:
> AFAIK, 100 is a 1xx response but it differs from other 1xx responses because:
> 1. it doesn't establish a dialog
> 2. it cannot (and must not) be sent realiably
>
> Regards,
> Attila
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz
> Castillo
> Sent: 20 August 2008 17:18
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] 1xx != provisional response
>
> El Wednesday 20 August 2008 18:09:37 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu escribió:
>> Hi Iñaki,
>>
>> Perfectly right!
>> single correction -? 1xx response start from 100 and not from 101 -
>> 100 Trying is a 1xx response
>
> Thanks, I was doubting since, I don't remember where, I read that 100 is not
> an 1xx response... not sure now.
>
> Thanks a lot for confirm me ;)
>
>
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
