From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Victor_Pascual_=C3=81vila?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   RFC3261, Section 10.3- Step 8 says:
   "The registrar returns a 200 (OK) response.  The response MUST
   contain Contact header field values enumerating all current
   bindings."

Whether the wording of the RFC needs to be corrected depends on the
precise usage of the words.

The confusion arises because the RFC presupposes the concept that for
certain headers, the *list* of values in all of the headers of that
type is significant, but which values are in which particular header
is not significant.  An *unspoken* consequence of that is that if the
list of value is empty, then no headers of that type are present.
(The syntax of those headers does not allow writing a header with no
values.)

Dale
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to