On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 23:22 +0200, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > Thanks a lot. IMHO is good to make SIP more simple (for example by replying > always to incoming IP:port in UDP) even if it breaks annoying backaward > compatibility with old and extrange implementations. Let's move on! ;)
Ok... tell you what... you change your implementation and explain to your customers why your product doesn't work with the stuff they've been using successfully for years. Let us know how that goes... then again, don't bother - we already know. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
