On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/29, Scott Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>  On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 23:22 +0200, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
>>
>>  >
>>  > Thanks a lot. IMHO is good to make SIP more simple (for example by 
>> replying
>>  > always to incoming IP:port in UDP) even if it breaks annoying backaward
>>  > compatibility with old and extrange implementations. Let's move on! ;)
>>
>>
>> Ok... tell you what... you change your implementation and explain to
>>  your customers why your product doesn't work with the stuff they've been
>>  using successfully for years.  Let us know how that goes... then again,
>>  don't bother - we already know.
>
> The other option is to continue with this pain forever and asking
> ourself why solutions as XMPP (for IM and presence) success, but not
> SIP SIMPLE.


That has NOTHING to do with rport. XMPP is a whole lot simpler than
SIP. Try doing call transfer, redundancy, fail over, load balancing
etc with xmpp. XMPP is good for IM and simple point to point voice
calls (jingle).  SIP is simply over engineered for point to point
instant messaging and presence - like shooting a fly with a cannon.
The only reason to use SIP for such things as presence is if you are
already using it for multimedia.

>
> Let's explain to a new SIP developer that in case of SIP TCP the reply
> must go to the real source ip:port, in case of UDP is depends on if
> "rport" is present or not, then take a look to Via header, take the
> host but not the port... and all that stuf, and there will become a
> new XMPP developer.
>
> Anyway I understand what you say, but AFAIK aysimmetrical SIP devices
> are not common today, are they?
>
> Best regards.
>
> --
> Iñaki Baz Castillo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors



-- 
M. Ranganathan

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to