From: "Paul Mossman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   When sending a "full" state Dialog Event NOTIFY, does simply omitting a
   terminated dialog from the dialog-info list imply that it has become
   terminated?  (Versus including it in the list, with a state of
   "terminated".)

   Section 4.3 of RFC 4235 does seem to indicate this, though not
   explicitly.  It states that the subscriber should maintain a table of
   dialogs, and that the table should be flushed upon receiving a full
   state update.  It also states that a terminated dialog may be removed
   from the table.  It seems implicit that a dialog flushed from the table
   should be considered terminated.  

It does look like section 4.3 requires the recipient to interpret the
NOTIFY in that way.  But I don't think that the subscriber is allowed
to omit explicitly mentioning the dialog with state 'terminated'.

Dale
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to