Dale wrote:
> It does look like section 4.3 requires the recipient to 
> interpret the NOTIFY in that way.  But I don't think that the 
> subscriber is allowed to omit explicitly mentioning the 
> dialog with state 'terminated'.

RFC 4235 doesn't seem to specify that the notifier must explicitly list
each terminated dialogs in a full state notification.

In fact, it probably shouldn't.  

Doing so would put an unnecessary burden on the notifier when reporting
full state.  It would have to track which subscribers had previously
been notified about dialogs that are now terminated.  

This would also mean that two full state notification documents for the
same notifier and point in time could look different, depending on the
history of the subscriber.

That seems strange to me.

Thoughts?  Thanks.


-Paul
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to