Hi, AFAIK loose routing is exclusively defined in RFC 3261, and it's clear and explained in *all* the examples and BNF section that "lr" has no value:
lr-param = "lr" <sip:proxy1>,<sip:proxy2>,<sip:proxy3;lr>,<sip:proxy4> So I wonder why there are various SIP devices that only do loose route if the Route/Record-Route header has a parameter like: ;lr=on ;lr=yes Of course it's a vendor issue, but... why is this error so common? any historic reason I miss? Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
