Hi, as far as I can read, RFC 4235 "An INVITE-Initiated Dialog Event Package" was born in November 2005. I expect 3 years are enough time to implement it.
But what I see is the fact that each vendor implements "dialog" subscription in a propietary way. For example, when configuring a Li**** phone for dialog subscription it requires to choose between subscription server type (Ast*****, Broa******, RFC4235, ...). This is just annoying for me. There are more and more new RFC's and drafts based on RFC 4235 for different purposses, when the fact is that most vendors implement such things as they want (it means: in a propietary way). This is no good for interoperability. Any explanation of this sad reality? Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
