2009/1/1 Dale Worley <[email protected]>: > Could you explain exactly what you mean by "proprietary" here?
I mean that each vendor implements this feature in a non standar way (with "standar" I mean a RFC or perhaps a draft). > It would probably be useful if you published a summary of the problems > you have discovered. Not too much for now. The only test I've done for now is with L***** phones. But if there are, at least, 4 kinds of dialog state server implementations, I expect there will be interoperability problems. > As for *why* this is so, I think it's due to the general tendency of > phone vendors (and other vendors) to expend as little effort as possible > on implementation. This leads to responses from vendors like the one we > received from Pol****, "It works with Broadwords." I suspect that in > the telecom world this is even worse than other parts of the computer > world, because vendors are used to having to tweak their systems to work > with each particular other vendor; there is little understanding of the > concept of "standards conformance" in practice. Yes, that's annoying :( Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
