>>Yes, in fact I hope you are right :)
I do too!!
I worry that one of the SIP heavyweights is going to correct me
( it's happened before!! )
I'm sure they will add something to clarify!
Regards,
Attila
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Iñaki Baz
Castillo
Sent: 09 February 2009 11:45
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] "Reason-Header" inCANCELthroughvariousproxies
2009/2/9 Attila Sipos <[email protected]>:
> Consider a stateless proxy - it definitely wouldn't strip out any
> header it didn't understand - for CANCEL or any other request.
>
> Stateful proxies are more complicated but still, I would unknown
> expect headers to persist.
>
> That is my expectation - I can't see anything that explicitly says any
> of this - but this feels right to me.
Yes, in fact I hope you are right :)
But I want to find some valid and fixed specification about it in order to
report this behaviour to some proxies implementors.
Anyway, with the info already received I think I have enough :)
Thanks a lot.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
