2009/2/24 M. Ranganathan <[email protected]>: > Features are implementable as User Agents. There is no need for a BACK > TO BACK User Agent to implement most features.
Ok, perhaps you could provice a proxy solution to replace a B2BUA in the 3 cases I comment in other mail in this thread. > Notable exception : > > Session Border Controller. :-) And isn't a SBC a common requeriment? Probably it's not a good idea that a SIP request created in an enterprise LAN travels through Internet showing private fields as Via, Contact and so. Of course, in order to provide privacy a B2BUA is required (Via are not propragated, Contact is replaced...). > Using a B2BUA where you should be using a proxy is needless > complication and just bad engineering. Is there any company or enterprise using a SIP proxy instead of a B2BUA? really? tell me just *one* example. Of course, I expect users in that company can transfer incoming calls from their PSTN SIP provider and so. Best regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
