On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/2/24 M. Ranganathan <[email protected]>: >>>> Using a B2BUA where you should be using a proxy is needless >>>> complication and just bad engineering.
> >> http://www.sipfoundry.org > > I don't understand the reason of this link. You did ask for one organization that uses a proxy server where a proxy server ought to be used. Here is an example of a well designed PBX solution that uses a proxy as its core routing engine. Please follow up and investigate who is using that solution. I will refrain from naming specific organizations. > > >> On the other hand, if I did come across a company using a B2BUA where >> a proxy ought to be used, I might question their wisdom. Individual >> companies shall not be named. > > So you have replied to no one of my questions (how to replace common > B2BUA services with a proxy). Please study the architecture of sipx. Services are User Agents and not Back to Back User Agents. There is a difference. These are "Common Services". > > Sorry but I've seen no arguments. I invite you to extend your point of view. There are some services that can be best structured only as Back To Back User agents (SBCs for example). Many others are constructed as User Agents (not B2BUA). Please take a look at the sipx architecture. You can connect enterprises using only proxy servers. You have to open up ports in your firewall and administer firewall rules and dial plans. I leave you with that point of view. Please feel free to explore. Best regards > > Best regards. > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
