If I understand correctly, UAC can resend the REGISTER-2 (with Authorization header) with out recalculating the digest response again. Provided it has the same nonce value and belongs to the same registration session.
Is this correct? On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Donguk, Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > > If those REGISTER-1 and -2 are in the same "registration-session", UAC has > same Nonce value. Therefore, It will be current response value in REGISTER- > 2 message, even if more than 500ms delay. > > It does not need to start with REGISTER-1 > > Regards, > Dong-uk, Kim > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:sip- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of cool goose > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:53 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Sip-implementors] Response code for a REGISTER request with > "Authorization" header > > Hi All, > > If UAC sends a REGISTER request with "Authorization" header with digest > response, should the registrar acknowledge it with 200 OK or 401 > Unauthorized? Also, Consider the below scenario: > > UAC sends REGISTER-1 to UAS > > UAC<---------401 Una authorized---UAS > > UAC----REGISTER-2----------> UAS > > > REGISTER-2 has "Authorization" header with digest response. > > Now, > > Lets assume that the UDP packet carry REGISTER-2 gets delayed say more than > 500ms before reaching the UAS. In such situation, can the UAC resend the > same REGISTER-2 request again? or does it need to start with REGISTER-1 and > get challenged and then send REGISTER-2? > > > Thank You, > CoolGoose. > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors > > _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
