El Miércoles, 13 de Enero de 2010, ROHIT CHAUDHARY escribió: > Hi experts, > > A sip-uri with user part as "anonymous" is allowed. But if the user > parameter is phone, ie, the user part is to be treated as > telephone-subscriber of tel-url (RFC 3966), then should it be allowed, > something like this: > > <sip:anonymous;[email protected];user=phone>
As you said, "if the user parameter is phone the user part is to be treated as telephone-subscriber of tel-url (RFC 3966)". Of course, "anonymous" is not a valid TEL number so the above SIP URI (which comes from a TEL URI due to the presence of "user=phone") makes no sense (IMHO). In order to get a better anonymous URI I would use just: From: Anonymous <sip:[email protected]>;tag=1928301774 This is, with no "user" param. However RFC 3261 doens't specify very well how to set an "anonymous" URI/sender. > > Is this a valid sip-url or should it be answered with 400 Bad Request? >From the point of view of the SIP ABNF grammar it's correct. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
