El Miércoles, 3 de Febrero de 2010, Franz Edler escribió: > > Sure. For example the outbound-draft (now RFC XXXX) statesthat the > > outbound > > proxy listens in UDP port 5060 for SIP and STUN protocols. > > Yes, of course. You can design any protocol to do everything via one port. > But I had the impression that with Nahum that is not the case. If you use a > legacy application which uses port x you cannot start another application > using the same port. The socket cannot be opend by the other application. > > Regarding STUN this is a special case. The new STUN protocol has been > designed to be multiplexed with every other protocol but you cannot compare > this with the situation of legacy SIP signalling and a legacy media > application. - In my opinion.
Yes, sure, I didn't mean that sharing the port was correct in this case (for sure it's an error in the SIP stack). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
