El Jueves, 11 de Febrero de 2010, Saúl Ibarra escribió: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Attila Sipos > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Your scenario is not valid unless PRACK is used. > > > > I hope this logic convinces you without an RFC3261 reference: > > 1. It's not valid because the 180 could've been lost. > > 2. Then when the 200 OK is received there will be no media. > > Absolutely, that was my point :) Thank you both for confirming it. > > Iñaki, do you have any RFC pointer on that so I can read further?
Pointing to what exactly? -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
