On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Saúl Ibarra <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Alex Hermann <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Friday 26 February 2010 09:04:37 Saúl Ibarra wrote: >>> I guess that also the fact that SIP specification only requires a UDP >>> implementation has something to do with the adoption of SIP over TCP. >> >> I don't know what specification you're talking about, but rfc3261 section 18 >> says: >> >> "All SIP elements MUST implement UDP and TCP. SIP elements MAY implement >> other protocols." >> > > Ouch, seems I got confused with something else... :-S >
Surprisingly, HTTPS is ubiquitous but SIP over TLS is not. I guess market pressures must bring to bear on the problem of deployment. Computing power is not an issue these days. Just buy another machine or 10. SIP load balancing is not difficult. Ranga > > -- > /Saúl > http://saghul.net | http://sipdoc.net > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors -- M. Ranganathan _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
