El Lunes 08 Marzo 2010, hanifa.mohammed escribió: > all, > In REGISTER request, UA puts '+sip.instance' param in the contact > header. > Isn't it mandatory for Registrar to keep the parameter while sending 200 ok > ? > > Pl find the related content from RFC5627. > > 5.2. Generating a REGISTER Response > When generating the 200 (OK) response to the REGISTER request, the > procedures of step 8 of Section 10.3 of RFC 3261 [1] are followed. > Furthermore, for each Contact header field value placed in the > response, if the registrar has stored an instance ID associated with > that contact, that instance ID is returned as a Contact header field > parameter. > > The actual problem is that openIms server returns the public gruu value > in 2xx of Register > but without '+sip.instance' parameter. > Is this ok to proceed processing the GRUU parameters?
Is '+sip.instance' a Contact URI param or a Contact header param? The registrar should store all the Contact URI params and also reply them. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/cucslists/listinfo/sip-implementors
